Search for: "The People v. Stephen Price" Results 121 - 140 of 280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Fourth Circuit ruled last week in IRAP v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by James Kim
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for food. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm by Ronald Mann
 Unfortunately, I don’t think many people left the courtroom knowing much more about the case than they did when they entered. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:11 am by Ronald Mann
Specifically, Star Athletica v Varsity Brands poses the question whether copyright law protects the uniform designs of market leader Varsity Brands from copying by upstart rival Star Athletica. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 12:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
For instance, in the leading Supreme Court precedent on this theory, Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But the firm’s interest is in creating positive/bottom-line maximizing info, not accurate representations of quality, price etc. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Large providers want to use zero rating or differential pricing schemes in order to move away from treating all content in an equal manner. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
This week brought good news for the petitioners’ counsel in a pair of one-time relists – if “lucky” can really be used to describe people who will spend their summer restricted by SCOTUS briefs; deep down, they envy those who retain their freedom. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The Chief Justice says that Justice Stephen G. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Stephen Carlisle, Nova Southeastern University: My primary gig is fair use. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This protects against the possibility that coverage might be precluded due to late notice simply because awareness of the claim had not made its way to the right people within the company. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 JC: give us more of flavor of how much of your takedown effort is automated v. human and what interaction is? [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
I can say that some day soon that you will pay the price for your financial recklessness and dishonesty. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
The relator in this case alleged that AT&T failed to offer schools and libraries participating in the federally established E-Rate Program the “lowest corresponding price” for services as required by federal regulations. [read post]