Search for: "The People v. Wesley"
Results 121 - 140
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2010, 10:04 am
(Hell, this post is Part V in a series with that title.) [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:49 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
If you're a protester, you go where the people are. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
v=4TPuttz2wes Is lifetime sinecure a bad thing? [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Dear Friends:Just wanted to tell you about this case that was recently decided against Aurora Loan Services. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
Pursuant to the Frye test, expert testimony based on scientific principles or procedures is admissible only after a principle or procedure has gained general acceptance in its specified field (People v Wesley, 83 NY2d 417, 422 [1994]). [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:54 pm
" Pfaff v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 10:20 am
an op-ed Turow wrote back in 2000 shortly after the Supremes decided Dickerson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
Via John Wesley Hall at the Fourth Amendment Blog, courtesy of Liberty and Justice For Y'all, the 5th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Rachlinski and Jourden’s test indicated that rights protected by property rules tended to show a stronger endowment effect than those protected by liabilities.[12] The test which was measured by a “willingness to sell/buy” indicated that a property regime produced more people who were unwilling to sell than a liabilities regime produced.[13] Furthermore the difference between the willingness to buy under a property regime vs. a liabilities regime was almost… [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:11 pm
Rep. 13 (Az 2/24/2010) People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 3:42 pm
But the employer has an affirmative defense under Faragher v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
" Rodriquez v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:15 pm
V. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
I. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 11:49 pm
This is the first time any of the Courts of Appeal have resolved this issue, which is must reading for anyone who wants to know why they cannot hear a particular song on demand when streaming music online.The case is Arista Records v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 2:44 am
The Second Circuit revives the case.The case is Aulicino v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Somerset, MA; Wesley Albernz, President) Alpine Restaurant Group, Inc. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:08 pm
" It is amazing when people casually use language that proves the point they are questioning.Related Reading on Dissenting Justice: Scalia v. [read post]
