Search for: "Thomas Robinson" Results 121 - 140 of 570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
They allege that their father’s wishes, spelled out in the Thomas Early Petty Living Trust, could not be clearer. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At American Thinker, Thomas Wheatley weighs in on The American Legion v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Kimberly Robinson reports at Bloomberg Law that, during “an interview with financier-philanthropist David Rubenstein” yesterday, “Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas [didn’t] seem eager to retire anytime soon. [read post]
24 May 2019, 6:12 am by ohioemployersinjurylawblog
This week’s special thanks go to Thomas Robinson at the work comp writer for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast, “Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin break down the 5-4 decision in Herrera v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf writes that “[a]lthough the majority opinion repeatedly invoked Founding-era sources, … it nonetheless departed sharply from the brand of originalism that Justice [Clarence] Thomas and his fellow conservatives purport to favor. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson recounts a “fun coincidence” that occurred on Monday: An advocate happened to be in the courtroom to attend a colleague’s oral argument when the Supreme Court’s decision in his case was handed down. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that during yesterday afternoon’s other argument, in Rehaif v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Brianna Cea and Thomas Wolf weigh in on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: In the latest episode of Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast, Elaine Goldenberg joins Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson to “break down arguments over partisan gerrymandering, administrative power, and race in the criminal justice system” and “discuss the biggest news of the sitting: Justice Thomas speaks! [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that after Wednesday’s oral argument in Kisor v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
 At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that the case suggests that “Justice Neil Gorsuch may prove to be a reliable vote for tribal groups coming before the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” At NPR, Nina Totenberg reviews Evan Thomas’ new biography of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, calling it “an unvarnished and psychologically intuitive look at the nation’s first female Supreme Court justice, and some of her contradictory characteristics. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson report that in separate concurrences, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch supported “incorporating the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause to the states by way of the privileges or immunities clause instead of via the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause,” “a view of the Constitution that could be incredibly consequential were it to eventually find favor with a majority of justices. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
However, Justice Thomas’s dissent argued that the majority’s broad deference to legislative judgment was to “effectively to delete the words ‘for public use’ from the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Kimberly Robinson at Bloomberg Law. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson report for Bloomberg Law that “what the justices say could suggest that Chevron deference—the rule giving deference to agency interpretations of statutes—could itself be in the cross hairs. [read post]