Search for: "Thomas v. Department of Education" Results 121 - 140 of 629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Meanwhile, in this not-all-that-imaginary future, it's also easy to foresee the Departments of Education and Justice in the next Republican administration looking very unkindly on circumvention.Is all of that a certainty? [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
At that time, four justices – Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh – noted that they concurred in the decision to deny review because the factual record was too undeveloped to grant preliminary relief to the coach, emphasizing that they did not “necessarily agree with the decision (much less the opinion) below. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:42 pm by Amy Howe
Perhaps, Thomas suggested, the focus of a public education should be on academic interests instead. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
” Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Nassif v Seven Network [2021] FCA 1286. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Mila Sohoni
” A decade ago, the Court held in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am by Peter Margulies
  As a quick review, it's important to note that DACA has two elements, as Chief Justice John Roberts explained in his opinion for the Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Moreover, the NCAA has strictly limited the benefits a college athlete can receive, even if those benefits are education-related.The Supreme Court in NCAA v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:04 am by Amy Howe
A new case on public funding and religious education Last year, in Espinoza v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:06 pm by Josh Blackman
After the change in administrations, the Trump Education Department withdrew a guidance document. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court in 2017 agreed to take up the case, but it ultimately sent the case back to the lower courts for another look, without hearing oral argument, after the Trump administration rescinded the Department of Education guidance on which the U.S. [read post]