Search for: "Thomas v. No Named Defendants" Results 121 - 140 of 1,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2014, 8:10 am by Iain Rutherford, Brodies LLP
Law The House of Lord decisions in: Clarke v Edinburgh & District Tramways Co Ltd 1919 SC HL 35 and Thomas v Thomas 1947 SC (HL) 45 establish that a trial judge is in a superior position, having seen and heard the witnesses, to form a conclusion as to the credibility and reliability of those witnesses. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:03 am
The drug is marketed under the trademarked name Synagis. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:28 am by Russ Bensing
  Not for now, though, and if one judge on the panel in State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:20 am
Brennan Associates, 293 Conn. 60, 72, 977 A.2d 107 (2009) (Brennan I), we upheld the judicial dissociation of the plaintiff, Thomas Brennan, from the named defendant, Brennan Associates (partnership). [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 9:13 am
ELOISE ANDERSON, as Director, etc., Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 11:39 am by Josh Blackman
Accordingly, we hold that sovereign immunity does not bar the petitioners' suit against these named defendants at the motion to dismiss stage. [read post]