Search for: "Thompson v. Kennedy" Results 121 - 138 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
J., and SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined, and in which STEVENS, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined, as to Parts I, II, and III. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:47 pm
Now, Rick is featured on the March cover of The ABA Journal  -- he debates fellow lawyer Ben Stevens over Mac v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Thompson, No. 07-1014 "Denial of a petition for federal habeas relief is affirmed over petitioner's arguments that: 1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his state trial for murder; 2) the revised 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1) violates Article III, the separation of powers, and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
View the article hereTimothy Fortney1, Jill Levenson2, Yolanda Brannon3 & Juanita N. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
(The opinions below in both White and Pack were unpublished and both were by the triumvirate of Judges Harty, Thompson and Kelly.) [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:22 am
Carolyn Maloney on June 6, 2007 06/07/2007 Legislative Text of the Fiscal 2008 Interior and Environment Appropriations Bill (HGW 106) (PDF 5.87 MB) Text as marked-up by the House Appropriations Committee on June 7, 2007 06/07/2007 Letter to CDC Director Julie Gerberding from Senate HELP Committee Chairman Ted Kennedy and Ranking Member Mike Enzi Letter asks for information about when the CDC became aware of Andrew Speaker's tuberculosis and how it handled the… [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 1:45 pm
Finally, Don Thompson of the AP reports here that the California senate approved a bill that would change the state's sentencing scheme in the wake of the Court's ruling in Cunningham v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
John Rogers and Thompson & Rogers (NFP) NFP criminal opinions today (8) (link to cases): Robert Goldsberry v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:31 pm
General Motors Corp., 373 U.S. 734 (1963), and Communications Workers v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 3:29 pm
One of the disgraces of the Supreme Court's opinion in Palmer v. [read post]