Search for: "Thompson v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am by Jon L. Gelman
Upon that filing, the statement or order, as the case may be, shall have the same effect and may be collected and docketed in the same manner as judgments rendered in causes tried in the Superior Court. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
Just two months before Al-Kidd, on March 29, 2011, the Supreme Court ruled in Connick v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Graeme Cowper v Fairfax Media Publications is continuing before a McCallum J and a NSW Supreme Court jury. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Thompson  (09-571), a 5-4 ruling issued March 29. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:25 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
In Pennsylvania, the idea of a specific “corporate negligence” claim was recognized by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the Thompson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  A judge of the Quebec Superior Court has dismissed a claim by Hasidic Jewish leaders against a Montreal blogger, Pierre Lacerte. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:58 am by Mark Ashton
This problem is a piece of the March 26 ruling by the Superior Court in O’Patchen v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
A simple example of this would be the constant complaints that we hear about the sentences given in the courts both at the superior and magisterial levels; someone may be found guilty of causing death by dangerous driving and is made to pay a sizeable fine with a short term of imprisonment or no imprisonment at all, while another is found guilty of manslaughter for carelessly or recklessly operating a piece of heavy machinery which causes the death of another and is given a… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
A simple example of this would be the constant complaints that we hear about the sentences given in the courts both at the superior and magisterial levels; someone may be found guilty of causing death by dangerous driving and is made to pay a sizeable fine with a short term of imprisonment or no imprisonment at all, while another is found guilty of manslaughter for carelessly or recklessly operating a piece of heavy machinery which causes the death of another and is given a… [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:10 pm by Chantal Bernier
  In 2016, the Ontario Superior Court went a step further in R. v Rogers Communications siding with Rogers and Telus, which had refused to grant the Peel Regional Police a “tower dump” of cell phone data to investigate a robbery. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
This year, the Supreme Court of Canada will likely decide Canadian National Railway v McKercher LLP. [read post]