Search for: "Toledo v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
Carter, et. al., United States of America v. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Welles-Bowen Realty Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 09a0025p.06 Barr v. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Welles-Bowen Realty Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 09a0025p.06 Barr v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
City of Toledo v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
City of Toledo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
Martinez Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0736n.06 Russell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
Sheets Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0412p.06 Martin v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 2:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all of Slusher's claims. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Poole Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0308p.06 2008/08/21 USA v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 3:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
USA Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0190p.06 2008/05/21 Kolpacke v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:12 pm
See Thoughts on United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Page Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0138p.062008/04/03 USA v. [read post]
