Search for: "Tonja"
Results 121 - 140
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2007, 9:52 pm
") Patry discusses an empirical study by Professors Matthew Sag, Tonja Jacobi and Maxim Stych, posted here on the Social Science Research Network, in which the authors present the results of their examination of the past 22 years of Supreme Court decisions in the fields of patents, copyrights and trademarks. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:47 am
” At The Washington Post (subscription required), Tonja Jacobi and others note that “[n]ine cases into the court’s current term, which began Oct. 7, the justices are observing a new rule that requires them to ‘generally’ hold their fire during the first 120 seconds of oral argument, allowing attorneys to have their say in a ‘quiet zone’ before the justices interrupt with their questions and comments. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:24 am
” In an analysis for The Washington Post, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag discuss their recent study of judicial behavior during Supreme Court oral arguments, showing that “[t]he justices as a group have taken an additional 13 minutes of argument after 1995 than before, an increase of 22 percent,” and positing that “behavior at the Supreme Court changed in response to a radical increase in political polarization. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
” More oral-argument analysis comes from Tonja Jacobi at SCOTUS OA, who presents recent research showing that “interruptions between two justices at oral argument are significantly associated with voting disagreement between pair in the eventual case outcome. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
"Oral argument is one transparent part of the court process," said Tonja Jacobi of Northwestern University Law School, who studies the court's oral arguments. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag write that the court “seemed considerably less inclined to allow the [Patent and Trademark Office] to prohibit swear words than to prohibit racial slurs. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
But a recent study by Professor Tonja Jacobi and J.D. candidate Dylan Schweers from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law concludes that the women justices on the Supreme Court “are just like other women: talked over by their male colleagues. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
And, of course, an eminent group of doctrinal scholars, including Brandon Garrett, Eve Primus, Randy Hertz, Marty Guggenheim, Tonja Jacobi, Lee Kovarsky, Yale Kamisar, and many others submitted an amicus brief explaining the history, development, and application of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment voluntariness doctrine. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Briefly: At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag follow up on their previous analysis of “the implications of justices cross-referencing other justices at oral argument,” “focus[ing] on the content of those cross-references. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:27 am
Tonja Jacobi and Dylan Schweers, Legal scholarship highlight: Justice, interrupted – Gender, ideology and seniority at the Supreme Court, SCOTUS Blog (April 5, 2017). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:01 am
Hasen references a forthcoming article by Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyzing 55 years of oral arguments and concluding that today the “justices are behaving like advocates,” not jurists. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:40 pm
The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Decisions Lee Epstein and Tonja Jacobi Annual Review of Law and Social Science December 2010, Vol. 6, No. 1: 341-358. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:02 pm
ACORN workers Tonja Thompson and Shera Williams gave such advice to O'Keefe and Giles, as the Borat-esque pair secretly videotaped their conversation; here's Part I and Part II, and a transcript. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:14 am
” It is evidently the addition of what playwrights call a “character journey” that most rankled Tonja Carter, who, as Lee’s long-time lawyer and the executor of her estate, initiated the lawsuit. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Briefly: At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag “begin to explore the phenomena of justice-to-justice name checking and conclude that, although there is significant variation between justices and over time, the practice is highly correlated with, and predictive of, agreement among the justices. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag expand on the results of their study of laughter during Supreme Court oral arguments, concluding that “judicial humor at the Supreme Court is often very much about dominance and hierarchy. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:21 pm
(For a nice explanation of Principal Component Analysis and similar techniques in the context of Supreme Court opinions, see this great article by Joshua Fischman and Tonja Jacobi.) [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze last week’s oral argument in Kahler v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
But a recent study by Professor Tonja Jacobi and J.D. candidate Dylan Schweers from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law concludes that the women justices on the Supreme Court “are just like other women: talked over by their male colleagues. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
But a recent study by Professor Tonja Jacobi and J.D. candidate Dylan Schweers from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law concludes that the women justices on the Supreme Court “are just like other women: talked over by their male colleagues. [read post]
