Search for: "Truman v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am by Scott Bomboy
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Richard Altieri, Hayley Evans
The court also cited its 1798 decision to postpone cases, which included United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
Truman asked the Departments of State and Defense for an assessment of American national security policy. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Truman Presidential Library and MuseumLaurie Austin, Audiovisual Archivist, the Harry S. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
And a consular official’s denial of a visa based on national security inadmissibility grounds was the subject of a 2015 decision cited approvingly by the majority: Kerry v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:53 am by Scott Bomboy
  In his 1897 report to the American Historical Association, Herman V. [read post]
President Truman used the exigencies of the Korean War as justification to seize control of the steel industries during a strike in 1952, which the Supreme Court struck down in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
Much of the commentary around on Trump’s proposed national emergency has focused on the framework set out in Justice Robert Jackson’s deservedly famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Eric M. Freedman
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
And in the political arena, the constitutional debates of the 1940s and '50s seem less relevant today than those of the Progressive era, when liberals first attacked the conservative Court as pro-business, and conservatives insisted that only the Court could defend liberty in the face of an out-of-control regulatory state. [read post]