Search for: "U. S. v. Drew" Results 121 - 140 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
The Court’s Decision In her decision last week in Borriello v Loconte, 2014 NY Slip Op 50241(U) [Sup Ct Kings County, Feb. 24, 2014], Brooklyn Commercial Division Presiding Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
But I suspect the  two, separating partners in Beauchamp v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am by Susan Brenner
” It also noted that `the agents apparently drew a similar conclusion by seeking defendant's consent before seizing the phones. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court would adopt Leval’s transformative framing in Campbell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
Oman's brief (this post continues below the document): Ralph Oman's Amicus Curiae Brief in Oracle v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 9:58 pm by Kyle Graham
A while ago, on my other site, I posted a simple Gashlycrumb Tinies-inspired abecedarian that drew from some notable Torts cases. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm by Andis Kaulins
"Since the velocity of the object as seen by the moving observer, "v", is the same after it emits the energy as it was before, the only way its kinetic energy can change is if its mass changes. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
However, recognizing that the proposed Amendment remedies are merely a short-term solution, Part V, also reprinted below, questions the compatibility of speculative invoicing with copyright law’s underlying goals and purposes, and makes some arguments in favor of systemic reform of copyright law more generally, an issue with which Questioncopyright.org is intimately familiar. ... [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Although sketchy, Butler's notes shed some new light on Crowell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:28 am by Susan Brenner
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of Janisch’s argument by noting, first, that she “[u]ndoubtedly, obtained data. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
 The church’s provocative picketing of military funerals was held by the Supreme Court to be protected by the First Amendment in Snyder v Phelps (2 March 2011), a case brought by the father of a dead Marine who sued the church for the distress caused by their attendance at his son’s funeral. [read post]