Search for: "U. S. v. Held"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The company’s board and management should think carefully to find ways in which the company’s response to a controversial issue can be integrated into the company’s practices and memorialized in the company’s policies. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Case Background The Supreme Court is poised to resolve this circuit split in Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:28 pm
That day, a motion was made to add "[t]he [V]ice-President and other Civil officers of the U. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Lopez v Pasternack, Tilker, Ziegler, Walsh, Stanton & Romano, LLP2024 NY Slip Op 30318(U) January 18, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 514717/2023 Judge: Richard J. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
The court held that the FTC had applied the wrong legal standard in evaluating Illumina’s “open offer” (see me here; Alden Abbott here and here; Jonathan Barnett here; and the International Center for Law & Economics’ (ICLE) amicus brief here). [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:36 am
Servider v Law Offs. of Cervini, Ronemus & Vilensky 2024 NY Slip Op 30160(U)January 12, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 161166/2022 Judge: Mary V. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am
The confusion in the caselaw stems from the Delaware case of Gentile v Rossette, 906 A2d 91, 98 [Del 2006], which held that a dilution claim could be both direct and derivative. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
” ( See Brownell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm
Near the end of 2023, the United States Supreme Court declined to consider the City of Costa Mesa’s appeal of a January Ninth Circuit ruling in SoCal Recovery, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm
Adams v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court has never held that the First Amendment grants dominant companies like social media giants a freewheeling right to censor others’ speech. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the same debates being held today about textualism and purposivism, and how those methodologies should be applied to the Constitution's "officer of the United States"-language, were also held 150 years ago. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
Reminiscent of the Wars of the Roses, our Supreme Court’s recent opinion in State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
LS3, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:55 am
LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 34417(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Dec. 12, 2023]). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
In Warshaw Burstein, LLP v Colambda Tech., Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 34435(U) December 14, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 150283/2023Judge: Louis L. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:31 am
Despite widespread misconceptions, prisoners do have rights protected under the Constitution, particularly under the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
