Search for: "U. S. v. Parks" Results 121 - 140 of 808
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2020, 4:32 am by Peter Mahler
Bannon in Matter of Cayne v 510 Park Avenue Corp., the court dismissed Cayne’s petition on the grounds that his “overly broad” demand for records was “supported only by speculation” of mismanagement by the co-op’s board. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:45 am by Josh Blackman
S. ___, ___ (2018) (slip op., at 15) (quoting Whitman v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:25 pm by David Greene
Courts have consistently applied this rule to social media platforms, including the 9th Circuit’s recent decision in Prager U v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Papua New Guinea’s commerce minister is suing Australian Financial Review for defamation over a series of articles about a multinational oil company’s dealings in the small Pacific nation. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  in Postiglione v Sacks & Sacks, LLP  2020 NY Slip Op 31164(U) April 17, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 513779/2019 Judge: Edgar G. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]