Search for: "U. S. v. Reed" Results 121 - 140 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am by bndmorris
Forsythe & Regina Maitlen, Stare Desis, Settled Precedent, and Roe v Wade: An Introduction, 34 Regent U. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
It’s not for the Transparency Project to speculate as to whether this is ill informed or deliberately partial press commentary but either way it’s inaccurate. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Melina Padron
Last week Ken Clarke’s criminal justice system reform proposals were hit by a change of mind/u-turn (or as Prime Minister David Cameron put it, ‘a sign of strength’) on the part of Government. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Eikenberry Case A recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Eikenberry v Lamson, 2020 NY Slip Op 33992(U) [Kings County Nov. 30, 2020], is a fine springboard for exploring the application of these legal standards to business divorce litigation where (as is often the case) the injunction movant’s ownership status in the business is hotly contested. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  This is amply demonstrated by Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. v Pollack  2019 NY Slip Op 50793(U)  Decided on May 17, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County  Reed, J.. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
"Continuous" has been defined as "[u]ninterrupted; unbroken, not intermittent or occasional; so persistently repeated at short intervals as to constitute virtually an unbroken series. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
This week’s other new (apparent) relist, American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the November 1, 2019, and November 8, 2019, conferences; relisted after the November 15, 2019, November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10 and January 17 conferences; likely relisted after the January 24 conference)   Reed v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]