Search for: "U.S. v. Ahmad*"
Results 121 - 140
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Similarly, in Karnail Singh and others v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Fifth and finally, “[t]he two most important military commission precedents in U.S. history—the trials of the Lincoln conspirators and the Nazi saboteurs [Quirin]—were trials for the offense of conspiracy. [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:27 pm
The Supreme Court has not engaged in a full-scale review of any war-on-terrorism case for nine years, since its 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:35 am
For the duration of the Iraq War, the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:43 am
Happy Birthday William: Shakespeare, Henry V and Salic Law A New Volume of U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 10:03 pm
I am inclined to agree with John Cole's comments in The Blogger Coverage of Iran that the blogosphere's breathless endorsement of allegations of election fraud in Iran has been slightly overblown and, from a factual standpoint, a bit hard to swallow.Andrew Sullivan's Twitter v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:39 am
Supreme Court case construing the act, Sosa v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:03 pm
(A copy of the panel’s decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:22 pm
As Deputy U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:14 pm
See Li v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:22 am
See Roe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
A similar dynamic has occurred following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm
The U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
Although the Supreme Court rejected the habeas-stripping provisions as unconstitutional in Boumediene v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 9:04 am
Circuit in 1979 in Curry v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:03 pm
Zazi or any target of intercepted calls had a privacy interest and was subjected to electronic surveillance was being used or was about to be used by a “foreign power” or an “agent of a foreign power; The last allegation is: The FISC application papers contain false statements, recklessly made, in violation of Franks v, Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). [read post]
