Search for: "U.S. v. Criminal Sheriff*"
Results 121 - 140
of 708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
On 4 March 2023, the Justices of the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 21, 2008 U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:13 am
Katz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:16 pm
Bowles v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:34 am
White, 496 U.S. 325 (1990), requiring only that the detaining officers ‘have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the person detained of criminal activity’. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:33 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 10, 2009 US v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:40 pm
We generally don't like to do that, particularly with criminal statutes (rule of lenity, etc.), and especially when there's an alternative meaning that's (1) pretty straightforward -- e.g., that "withholding" means not testifying, which is what our usual sense of the term would mean -- and (2) makes both statutes make sense.Judge Clifton responds that statutes often overlap because they're written by anal, risk-adverse lawyers. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
U.S. (06-1456). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:46 am
Alabama, 567 U.S. __ (2012), but lower courts have split about whether Miller applies retroactively. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:43 am
’ U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 12:19 pm
And under State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:23 am
The opinion in Richard Lynn Winfrey v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:50 am
Texas and Texas v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
Under such circumstances, the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
