Search for: "U.S. v. Sutton"
Results 121 - 140
of 355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2013, 12:29 pm
New Hampshire, __ U.S. __, 132 S. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:15 am
Frost (Art Lien) The modern history of state attorneys arguing as amicus curiae in the Supreme Court began with then-Ohio State Solicitor Jeffrey Sutton’s 1997 argument in City of Boerne v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
’ Sutton v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Applying the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
Welles-Bowen Realty, Inc., 736 F.3d 722, 732–33 (6th Cir. 2013) (Sutton, J., concurring) (highlighting problems with requiring the rule of lenity to bow to Auer deference); see also Perez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm
Sutton, 310 S.C. 200,422 S.E.2d 750, 753 (1992). [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:23 am
Donovan U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 144 (2006) (likewise); Miller v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), provided the opportunity for a wholesale re-examination of the federal sentencing scheme that had held judges, defendants and practitioners alike in thrall for some 17 years. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:01 pm
Sutton v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:52 pm
Bouldry, slip op. at 5 (citing Sutton v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
Victoria Sutton, Can the Red Wolf survive the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
The Court’s cert. grant in Fisher v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
” Mitts v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
Culley and Sutton contend that courts should apply the three-part test outlined in the court’s 1976 decision in Mathews v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:41 pm
United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471 (1999), and Toyota Motor Mfg. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:18 am
Blue Hills Bank, 575 U.S. 496 (2015), while Judge Thapar’s (Sutton and McKeague joining) began with the text of the bankruptcy appeals statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Washington v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:17 am
Wesby, ___ U.S. ___, 138 S.Ct. 577 (2018), that it might be time for the court to re-examine Whren v. [read post]
