Search for: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. CASTLE" Results 121 - 140 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2012, 1:37 pm
Unfortunately, that's the situation Melinda Hernandez found herself in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:29 am by Paul Caron
Jan. 24, 2012): The United States appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.) invalidating two notices of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustments issued by the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:46 am by Lewis Lazarus
The Texas plaintiffs initiated the Texas action notwithstanding that Malouf had agreed in each of the five agreements "to the exclusive jurisdiction of any state court within New Castle County, Delaware or, if it can obtain jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware sitting in Wilmington, Del. ... with respect to any claim or cause of action arising under or relating to th[e] agreement[s]. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:25 am by Francis Pileggi
  Contrary to El Paso, in this case the forum selection clause was broader than the one in the El Paso case and enforceable as to legal and equitable claims because the parties submitted “‘to the exclusive jurisdiction of any state court within New Castle County, Delaware or, if it can obtain jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware sitting in Wilmington, Delaware . . . with… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:10 am by Conor McEvily
  Although Skinner’s efforts to seek relief in federal district court are pending, state courts have rescheduled his execution for November. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
  Not so, says the 6th District in State v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  However, Kowalski was able to catch on with another Mid-Atlantic League team, the independent New Castle (Pa.) [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am by Marie Louise
Garber (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Court analogizes inequitable conduct pleading to false marking pleading: Patent Compliance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This is true at the time of the commission of the offence, and remains true when the offender is imprisoned, as has been recognised in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 41. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under… [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
(PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches websites to discuss patent and trademark procedures (inovia) US Patent Reform Will patent reform come up in a big way in the 112th Congress? [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
Allegiance Corporation (TTABlog) Another restaurant name dispute – District Court S D New York: Nothing Heavy, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:15 am by SHG
  Any voluntary statements made by the suspect shall be admissible in any prosecution thereafter brought by the United States or by the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
  There is also a corresponding criminal case in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am by Anthony Lake
, 514 U.S. 695 (1995), that a federal court is not a department or agency of the United States for the purposes of making false statements in a matter within the jurisdiction of the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm by cdw
In favor of the State &/or Warden (Notable) United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]