Search for: "UNOCAL CORPORATION" Results 121 - 140 of 269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Shore (Columbia University), on Monday, January 15, 2024 Tags: Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, economics, ESG, Shareholders ESG Performance Metrics in Executive Pay Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, on Monday, January 15, 2024 Tags: ESG, ESG Performance, executive pay, incentive plans, metrics Strategic Compliance Posted by Geeyoung Min (Michigan State University), on Tuesday, January 16, 2024 Tags: compliance, compliance programs, Corporate compliance,… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Shore (Columbia University), on Monday, January 15, 2024 Tags: Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, economics, ESG, Shareholders ESG Performance Metrics in Executive Pay Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, on Monday, January 15, 2024 Tags: ESG, ESG Performance, executive pay, incentive plans, metrics Strategic Compliance Posted by Geeyoung Min (Michigan State University), on Tuesday, January 16, 2024 Tags: compliance, compliance programs, Corporate compliance,… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 5:59 am
As one vice chancellor put it, a consensus has taken root that “Blasius ‘ main role, to the extent it has one, is as a specific iteration of the intermediate standard of review laid out in Unocal. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Most notably, they are owed fiduciary duties in their capacity as stockholders but not as employees or customers (see Unocal, Revlon, and Gheewalla). [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Bainbridge, Unocal at 20: Director Primacy in Corporate Takeovers, 31 Del. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
A discussion can be found on the Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation blog here and on the Wall Street Journal Law blog here. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:10 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Ch. 2010), in which Strine discusses the difference between rationality and reasonableness review in corporate law: The employment of a reasonableness standard to distinguish the type of heightened judicial review required under Unocal and Revlon from the bare rationality review characteristic of the business judgment rule is a move in some ways analogous to a distinction made in political philosophy. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
While a Van Gorkom or Unocal was possible in the 1980s, Disney and other similar cases show that this is no longer the case. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Edward M. McNally
The decision is also noteworthy for its rejection of the idea that preservation of a unique corporate "culture" justifies defensive action under the Unocal  test. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:03 am
Although legislatively possible, there currently is no statutory provision authorizing comparable exculpation of corporate officers. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
Under the previous Blasius standard, the board had to prove a "compelling justification" before taking any action, such as postponing a stockholder meeting, that affected the stockholders' right to vote.This opinion recasts the standard closer to the familiar Unocal test where director action that affected a proposed takeover had to be a reasonable response to a perceived threat to corporate policy or interests. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
Under the previous Blasius standard, the board had to prove a "compelling justification" before taking any action, such as postponing a stockholder meeting, that affected the stockholders' right to vote.This opinion recasts the standard closer to the familiar Unocal test where director action that affected a proposed takeover had to be a reasonable response to a perceived threat to corporate policy or interests. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:39 am by Broc Romanek
It found that the NOLs were a valuable corporate asset and, therefore, an "ownership change" which might jeopardize their value constituted a valid threat to corporate policy and effectiveness. [read post]
 With the grant of certiorari (as expected) in Kiobel on 17 October 2011, the Supreme Court now has an opportunity to address the circuit split on the issue of corporate liability under the ATS – a circuit split that continues to widen, with the recent decision of the Ninth Circuit in Sarei v Rio Tinto on 25 October 2011 coming down on the side of corporate liability for human rights violations (as it had previously done in Unocal). [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:40 pm
In Unocal Corp v Mesa Petroleum Co (493 A. 2d 946, 957 (Del SC, 1985), the Delaware Supreme Court stated that "our corporate law is not static. [read post]