Search for: "US v. Anthony Thomas" Results 121 - 140 of 1,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
  When the Court does speak on family law the ears of us family law lawyers perk up! [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Lovechilde
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83, Anthony Kennedy is 79 and Stephen Breyer is 77. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:54 am by Misha Tseytlin
Two Terms ago, Justice Antonin Scalia – joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – opined in a concurring opinion that the courts should not create “an entirely separate, abridged edition of the First Amendment applicable to speech against abortion. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 8:37 am
Supreme Court opinion in an argued case issued in Washington State Grange v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford, “may turn on whether the challengers can convince [Justice Anthony] Kennedy that a manageable standard exists to outlaw extreme gerrymanders without calling into question more modest uses of political power. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm by Orin Kerr
Professor Kerr was a law clerk for Justice Anthony M. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Amy Howe
For very different but overlapping reasons, Justices Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor disagreed. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:47 am
Scalia and Thomas went out of their way to reiterate their view that Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:47 am
Scalia and Thomas went out of their way to reiterate their view that Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Amy Howe
”  Although the focus was on same-sex marriage and Alabama, coverage of and commentary on King v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am by Russ Bensing
  Yesterday, the US Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the Michigan Supreme Court was right in holding that Covington’s statements were inadmissible because they were testimonial under Crawford v. [read post]