Search for: "US v. Collins" Results 121 - 140 of 1,864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
  I'm also confident that the plaintiff's expert is correct that if you use fancy (and presumably more expensive) polymers in the window, and then tilt the windshield back so that it stands less "upright," maybe even a two-and-a-half pound chunk of concrete will bounce off the windshield instead of smashing through it.For this reason, the Court of Appeal holds that it's a straightforward products liability suit. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:53 am by Matthew Lanahan
Monday’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of The Progeny: Justice William Brennan’s Fight to Save New York Times v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:43 am by Richard Hunt
² See my blogs Transunion v Ramirez – has the Supreme Court put an end to cheap standing in ADA litigation? [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
”  (Daugherty, supra, 144 Cal.App.4th at p. 835; see Rubenstein, supra, 14 Cal.App.5th at p. 881; Collins v. eMachines, Inc. (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 249, 255 (Collins).) [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
”  (Daugherty, supra, 144 Cal.App.4th at p. 835; see Rubenstein, supra, 14 Cal.App.5th at p. 881; Collins v. eMachines, Inc. (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 249, 255 (Collins).) [read post]