Search for: "US v. Craig Smalls"
Results 121 - 140
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
See Blay v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 11:36 pm
(Trademark Blog) Can we have fair use without fair use technology? [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:08 am
The proxy statement explained that Craig-Hallum selected discount rates "based upon an analysis of PLATO's weighted average cost of capital" and disclosed that Craig-Hallum used a discount rate range of 23% to 27%. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
More of what we used to produce ourselves will be imported. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:18 pm
In Simmons v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:09 am
Kenneth Cole Productions (LIC) Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
Leroy V, Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Because they're so useful! [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Because they're so useful! [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Craig Pingle alleges that he should have received a settlement totaling more than $436,000. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
How To Get And Defend A Patent Without Going Broke It is possible for independent inventors and small businesses to acquire patents and protect their ideas without going broke in the process. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:58 am
But in a surprise move Tuesday, attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies, who opposed each other in Bush v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:34 pm
v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
(I'm going to put to the side the rule of Maryland v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 7:30 am
§ 107 (2000).7 Meeropol v. [read post]
