Search for: "US v. Durham"
Results 121 - 140
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Durham, 15-631, rescheduled for conference four times already, and now (apparently) on its first true relist. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
This is an article in Lexology asking the question: The “offer to make amends” in defamation cases: No longer a useful tool for defendants? [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:17 pm
App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Sept. 3, 2019) The plaintiff sued the State of North Carolina, City of Durham, various people who worked for the State Bureau of Investigation, the Durham Police Department, and the Durham County District Attorney’s office for a permanent injunction and money damages to redress harms allegedly suffered in connection with his pretrial detention, investigation, and prosecution. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
Durham 15-631Issue: (1) Whether the Court should reconsider, and then overrule or modify, the portion of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 5:47 am
” In Bibbs v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Clear principles limiting the exercise of this power were established in the case of R v Governor of Durham Prisoner ex parte Haridal Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 (now often referred to as “the Hardial Singh principles”). [read post]
23 May 2007, 12:13 pm
For further details see the conference website: http://www.shakespearelaw.org "Let us haste to hear it, and call the noblest to the audience" Hamlet, Act V, Scene II [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:49 am
iii) Support network neutrality, giving each user a fair share of bandwidth to use in communicating with any other user with any protocol. iv) We support an innovative and competitive market place while promoting private sector infrastructure investment. v) We support initiatives promoting telepresence and telecommuting to overcome geographical barriers. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 11:26 am
Matthew Tokson analyzed federal and state judgments applying Carpenter v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:15 pm
I first encountered Loving v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
The defendants in US v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
In Durham v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
In Durham v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
In Durham v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
In Durham v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:47 pm
" Durham v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
This was the plaintiff’s theory of the underlying case at issue in Stokes v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:46 pm
Our broadcast operators have a 10-second delay button they can choose to use. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:10 pm
Rohini Kurup explained the background and procedural history of Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]