Search for: "US v. Jeremy Doe"
Results 121 - 140
of 651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
Does trade-mark likelihood of confusion actually exist? [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
But it does raise issues, writes Jeremy. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
General Court does not duck the issueValentina explains Case T-559/13 Giovanni Cosmetics Inc. v OHIM, Vasconcelos & Gonçalves SA, where the Court had to decide on a likelihood of confusion between two Italian-sounding marks for cosmetics.* IP litigation and enforcement: the pendulum effect -- and a new eventIP enforcement and IP conferences are like a pendulum, Jeremy says. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:28 am
’ This raises the interesting question: when does information in the public domain become stale? [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:28 am
This GCRO follows on from an Extended Civil Restraint Order which was made in September 2015 and expired on 25 March 2017 (and was reported by Jeremy here).Mr Perry's first patent infringement claim failed. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 6:01 pm
" Most prominently, tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
What does that mean TTIP-wise, wonders Birgit? [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Also at Greenwire, Jeremy P. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:26 am
Briefly: In a wrap-up of environmental cases at Greenwire, Jeremy P. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:25 am
Jeremy Phillips and Neil Wilkof paid tribute to him. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
As the US Supreme court explained in Broadrick v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
Accordingly, the scope of the injunction may be limited by a defendant proving that his use does not affect or in not liable to affect the functions of the trade mark. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:38 am
The Supreme Court released its opinion in Teva v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:03 pm
This has meant that it is unclear what the scope of the protection of the colour marks is.In addition, local practice has not been to file evidence of use of the registered trade mark (to show enhanced distinctiveness or protection in a colour) when claiming infringement, due to a belief that such evidence was only relevant in passing off proceedings.Afro Leo has already expressed his view in these posts here and here, that evidence of use is relevant for infringement and… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
* Graduated response in Australia: what does the draft code of practice say? [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:19 am
As Jeremy Phillips puts it: ‘It is likely that the decision will then be appealed whatever that court does’. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
