Search for: "US v. King"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
But it is useful, as one examines the priestly role in modern western states, to consider a more traditional relationship between the priest and the state. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Section 25(1) “essentially provides that a police officer is justified in using force to effect a lawful arrest, provided that he or she acted on reasonable and probable grounds and used only as much force as was necessary in the circumstances” (R. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 7:29 am
Glover v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
After the Kings County Supreme Court denied that request, an appeal followed.While the full definition appears below, a “serious injury” under the law is specifically defined. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm
Netflix was decided after the Supreme Court managed to make fair use even more complicated in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In 1989, in City of Richmond v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
Combined Insurance Co. of America, 73 So.2d 403, 405 (Fla. 1954), citing King v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
After this case was publicized, the Manitoba Court of King’s Bench issued a practice direction mandating that “when artificial intelligence has been used in the preparation of materials filed with the court, the materials must indicate how artificial intelligence was used. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Do lawyers and judges need a different kind of training from the traditional methods used in the past? [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
It has recognized that a search occurs whether the particular method employed by the government entails a "compelled surgical intrusion into an individual's body" (Winston v Lee, 470 US 753, 759 [1985]; see Schmerber, 384 US at 767); "gentle" or "light" contact with the body (see Maryland v King, 569 US 435, 446 [2013]); "brief" contact with "outer clothing" (Terry v Ohio, 392… [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:15 am
Can you tell us a little bit about that case and what it tells us about dress codes? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
” Some U.S. officials have warned that using seawater may endanger Gaza’s water supply. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm
Recently, during the oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
There was no tradition of the King appointing members to be King or to succeed the King. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
What’s new is that with GenAI, what was once a question of “I may want to use the data in the future” has now become “I will need to use the data in the future. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm
Let us inquire further. [read post]
