Search for: "US v. Luna" Results 121 - 140 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm by Joshua Matz
  Judges use what’s known as the rope-a-dope trick. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 12:16 pm by Michael O'Hear
More speculatively, another very recent decision, United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Stern, a California lawyer; no dice, said the district court in Stern v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
Luna seeks to protect the quality of airline food for all of us via a tort suit with a $15 million demand. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:46 am by Paul Cassell
  Here’s the abstract: One of us (Cassell) is a former federal judge nominated by President George W. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
Plaintiff has never authorized Defendants to use the MAFIA WARS mark, sell Virtual Goods for use in the Game, or transfer Virtual Goods that Defendants have “sold” to players through the Infringing Websites.Zynga Game Network Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:42 am by Steve Hall
Then there are conservatives who worry about government seizure of private property said to have been used to facilitate crimes, an issue raised in Alvarez v. [read post]