Search for: "US v. Sales"
Results 121 - 140
of 22,375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
These include unique quality materials and craftsmanship, discounting and promotional activity, omnichannel approach and sales experiences, and production facilities that set it apart from the other segments of the handbag industry. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:04 am
The owners of famous or iconic marks who may have experienced, due to market conditions outside of their control, a downturn in sales might still have a reputation even if it has not been in use for a couple of years.Marcel Pemsel considered the recent General Court judgment on the refusal to register the trade mark 'Pablo Escobar' (T-255/23). [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
Conditions of sale and purchase The particular conditions of the sale or confiscation of an artwork must also be considered in the determination of a claim, as they will directly influence the restitution process. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
Lorentzen (Michigan law mandating 20 years’ imprisonment for sale of marijuana ruled cruel and unusual under state and federal constitutions); People v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am
At that time, the three members agreed to market the Company for sale through an investment banking firm. [read post]
5 May 2024, 10:26 am
The briefing cites to Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am
However, like all automakers, Ford did experience a dip in sales during the pandemic. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:13 am
Continue Reading › The post Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (MAPT) v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am
SnapRays, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Given the discrepancy between “all” and, apparently, no copying, there is a triable issue as to whether the MFB formed a subjective good faith belief that Action Care’s sale of its OvoProof was infringing, or if instead MFB were willfully blind to the fact that Action Care was not infringing in violation of 512(f). [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
A more compelling justification is that tobacco makers have spent more than a century successfully framing the sale of tobacco products and consumers’ desire to buy and use them as a manifestation of fundamental American negative rights: individual liberty and autonomy. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Jorge Alcarez, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:22 pm
In SIA v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:56 pm
[2] Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Hart v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:52 am
Waterman is not a tax case but is often used to assist in determining whether a patent transfer is a sale or license. [read post]
