Search for: "USA v. State of Ohio" Results 121 - 140 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm by Michael Stevens
USA     Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0770n.06  Xiao Zhuang v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm by Michael Stevens
USA     Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0770n.06  Xiao Zhuang v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Brunner     Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0430p.06  USA v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the BIA. 07a0434p.06 USA v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Conor McEvily
  And Jessie Balmert at the Newark (Ohio) Advocate discusses Monday’s cert. denial in Ohio v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm by Nietzer
In determining whether or not the judgment will be enforced, the court will evaluate what “comity,” as defined in Hilton v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Page    Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0138p.062008/04/03 USA v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda was Byrd v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
The First Amendment issues in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by SHG
Amnesty’s report also charges that the laws on lethal force in 13 states do not even meet the less stringent constitutional standard set by the 1985 US supreme court case Tennessee v Garner. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
The lawsuit also claimed that the State of Connecticut, through its statutes, gave unconstitutional preferences to the Episcopal Church (USA). [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:27 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 08a0090p.06 USA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
The first 83 cases, generally grouped by the State in which they each originated, are the legal actions filed since 2000 (of which I am aware) where the Episcopal Church (USA) and/or one of its dioceses played the role of plaintiff—the party who initiates a case in court by filing a complaint to seize the assets and real property of any church choosing to leave ECUSA. [read post]