Search for: "United States Supreme Court, any and all Judicial Officers thereof"
Results 121 - 140
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2022, 5:58 am
”The Supreme Court has interpreted Section 101 as imposing per se limits on eligibility by excluding from protection laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas (judicial exceptions).The Court provided a two-step framework for assessing eligibility. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:28 am
" Section 1983 allows them to gain the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.The document reads:Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the… [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm
The oath, however, is meant to show that all elected officials have sworn allegiance to the Canadian state. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
[and] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Potential Blanket Legal Barriers Here is the text of Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
For a constitutional scholar and teacher who will, on January 20, 2009, unreservedly take an oath "faithfully [to] execute the Office of President of the United States" and, to "the best of [his] Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States," it cannot suffice that the institutional limits of the Article III Judicial Branch would let him get away with a violation of that oath. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
LBD11739-02-7
A. 7913 2
1 supreme court shall be increased by adding thereto a percentage thereof
2 equaling the percentage by which the salary of a judge of the United
3 States district court was increased in such twelve-month period. [read post]
31 May 2017, 2:06 pm
§ 1395ii], or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 or 1346 of title 28 to recover on any claim arising under [the Medicare Act, see § 1395ii]. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
In The National Bank Act it states: “No national bank shall be subject to any visitorial powers except as authorized by Federal law, vested in the courts of justice or such as shall be, or have been exercised or directed by Congress or by either House thereof. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
SCOTUS on Presidential Pardons Most important of all, the Supreme Court has taken an extremely broad view of the pardon power. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
United States, two Supreme Court decisions nearing their respective centennials, have long formed a stable basis for assessing the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm
One ground was a law known as the “federal officer removal statute,” which allows the removal to federal court of lawsuits filed in state court against “any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, in an official or individual capacity, for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Section 3 of the Copyright Act provides that the copyright owner has the sole right to reproduce “the work or any substantial part thereof”. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:00 am
Having concluded it best for the nation to have a check on Executive Power, the drafters came up with Article II § 4 of the Constitution, which states: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
As the Supreme Court noted in the 1981 Dames & Moore case, “[t]he language of IEEPA is sweeping and unqualified. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm
Basis for patent eligibility standards In July 2017, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published its PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER: REPORT ON VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm
Basis for patent eligibility standards In July 2017, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published its PATENT ELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER: REPORT ON VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am
United States, Canales v. [read post]
