Search for: "United States v. Anderson"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2007, 9:40 am
United States, the crack v. powdered cocaine sentencing case. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:17 am
Los Angeles County, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 10-56017 (March 10, 2011). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Although the United States Constitution does not specifically guarantee voting secrecy, Anderson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:28 am
On December 31, 2020, the Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion, adopting the federal court’s summary judgment standard as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Evans to United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 7:25 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
The Colorado state trial court held that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Anderson. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 2:02 pm
Marc Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
House of Representatives and the Senate already have determined that Donald Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021 “warrants … disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 7:10 pm
Vincentini v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 10:23 am
Anderson, 448 Mass. 548, 553-554 (2007). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am
Since the Court’s 1984 ruling in Strickland v Washington, the United States Supreme Court has applied a two part test for determining whether counsel was ineffective: (a) whether there was a breach of counsel’s duty to the defendant; and, (b) “but for” that error, the defendant stood a reasonable chance for acquittal. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
That the presidency is not an “office, civil or military, under the United States” for purposes of the first, “Positions” Clause of Section 3. [read post]