Search for: "United States v. Bartlett"
Results 121 - 140
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Bank, University of California, Los Angeles, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Executive Compensation,Labor markets, Management, Taxation Political Contributions and Lobbying Proposals Posted by Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, is “part of a campaign to use the courts in service of a libertarian rollback of the administrative state. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
.Bartlett v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:27 pm
(2) Whether a plaintiff relying on the FSIA’s expropriation exception must exhaust available remedies in the relevant country before invoking the jurisdiction of United States courts? [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
The United States files a brief that technically supports neither party, but in practical effect seems to provide considerable benefit to POM. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Among the first courts to address Levine in the context of a generic manufacturer was the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Stacel v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:35 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
In Bartlett v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
De Grandy and Bartlett v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:06 pm
And, finally, in 1975, the Court stated in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
And drug companies are deep pockets, so these cases provide one instance after another (Bartlett was another SJS/TENS case) of courts leaning over backwards to justify liability. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
Public Service Commission, is a “a substantial interest to be achieved by restrictions on commercial speech,” 447 U.S. 557, 564 (1980), we’re certain that mining the government’s briefs in prior First Amendment litigation such as United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
Knight.Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Stulz (Ohio State University), and Zexi Wang (Lancaster University), on Monday, February 6, 2023 Tags: CEOs, Corporate governance, Public Scrutiny, ROA, S&P 500, SEC ESG in 2023: Politics and Polemics Posted by David N. [read post]
