Search for: "United States v. Callahan"
Results 121 - 140
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:11 pm
” Id.at *2 (citing United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:19 pm
Callahan and United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:01 am
Similarly, in R.E. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Guy on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am
Nelson, Bade, Collins, and Lee) (joined by two senior judges, O'Scannlain and Trott), and Justice Neil Gorsuch repeatedly mentioned in his opinion that the Ninth Circuit’s decision was rendered over the dissenting views of at least 12 members of that court.The second is United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
In a brief order, the Court dismissed the appeal in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
The United States as amicus will be represented by David O’Neil, assistant to the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:30 am
United States, No. 08-5721. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 4:46 am
United States, Civil Action No. 06-1824(EGS), 2007 U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
That's no excuse at all; when the United States Attorney endows lawyers with the powers of federal prosecutors, he has a responsibility to properly train and supervise them so as to avoid trampling defendants' rights. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm
United States, 134 S. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
