Search for: "United States v. Carr"
Results 121 - 140
of 380
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
Carr J , whilst noting that it was no reflection on the solicitor who had originally given the statement, stated that he did not believe AbbVie's explanation for its decision to abandon the '656 patent because it was not credible given the context. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Carr --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 6:26 pm
Sims, and from United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
In Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:18 am
Lutz v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:51 am
Jefferson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am
Any doubt on this issue is resolved by the CJEU decision in Solvay v Honeywell which provides a clear analogy. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 2:48 pm
This case was decided on remand from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:35 pm
Sims, and from United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am
” At Notice and Comment, David Rubinstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram discuss United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
Madison stated: “By the constitution of the United States, the president is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discretion, and is accountable only to his country in his political character and to his own conscience. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
United States, 84 Ct. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
As the Court later explained in Baker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm
United States and Mathis v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
In this one, Annsley reports about the speeches of Maria Martin-Prat (Head of Unit - Copyright, DG Connect at the European Commission), Michele Woods (Director, Copyright Law Division, WIPO), Maria Pallante (Register of Copyrights, US Copyright Office), and many others IP-enthusiasts about the role of copyright and trade marks in the new, digital, multisensory IP world.* Fordham 2016: Outstanding patent issues - the UPC, dual-track systems and Alice v CLS BankFrom trade marks and… [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:05 am
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse argues that, if the Justices “approach their task as judges and not as politicians, the administration will easily prevail” in United States v. [read post]
