Search for: "United States v. Certain Accounts"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,785
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
In National Small Business United v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
In a previous article, we analyzed what made protests successful at the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) in Fiscal Year 2023 (“FY23”). [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
The other justices united around that view. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:24 am
In Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:54 pm
Regarding data breaches, Transunion LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
And these are just the possibly sympathetic figures: For others, see the Bible's account of Judas, or any book noting the deaths of Hitler, Himmler, Goering, or Goebbels. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
But freedom of speech implies a right against compelled speech: the right to speak includes the right to choose what to say, i.e., the right not to say certain things. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Under the second view, Section 788 was discussing how the American system of impeachment differs from the British system of impeachment: whereas in Great Britain, "all the king's subjects" could be impeached, under the federal Constitution, impeachment was "strictly confined" to certain government positions. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
I am 100% certain that they all fantasize about doing this, even if they won't actually pull the trigger. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:35 pm
They pointed to other states that regulate pricing through acts of the legislature, not the courts, and only to regulate certain items. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
He left the bulk of his estate to the United States.[2] He never explained what he expected the United States to do with the money, which was then the largest unrestricted gift ever made to the federal government.[3] “Taxes are the price we pay for civilized society,” he’d once written in a famous dissent.[4] Was the bequest a kind of tax he felt he owed the country? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
Finally, as the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
