Search for: "United States v. Certain Land and Interests in Property"
Results 121 - 140
of 620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making--The States and the People; Popular referendums. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:08 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:22 pm
Army Corps of Engineers, the Mountain States Legal Foundation (a public-interest law firm based in Denver) filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Idaho residents, regarding Corps recreational land in Idaho. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
See Jovic v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
United States, 952 F.2d 1364 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am
The Court concluded that because there was no exaction, there was no unconstitutional condition — the 15% requirement does not bind a landowner to give up a property interest, or to provide public works or money in lieu of a property interest to the public. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:23 pm
- Ticketmaster Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 3:51 pm
United States, which involved the Crow Tribe’s efforts to regulate non-Indian hunting and fishing on non-Indian-owned land within the tribe’s reservation. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Firms and funds with acute interest in ESG are adamant that issues such as climate change and human capital management are financially material, albeit non-traditional, issues. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
The second section examines limited state STR-related regulations, various local land use approaches, the legality of previously enacted STR-related land use controls, and other governmental agency responses. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
The second section examines limited state STR-related regulations, various local land use approaches, the legality of previously enacted STR-related land use controls, and other governmental agency responses. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
JAMES MADISON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES5 U.S. 137; 2 L. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
The Longs were unable to exercise their option to purchase the leased land, but they refused to vacate the property. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed and held that the Florida Supreme Court erred on both grounds. [read post]