Search for: "United States v. Cotton" Results 121 - 140 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6]  On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7]  In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am by Kristen Fries
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared each of Alice’s patents invalid for not defining patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am by Jeffery Robinson
We are two months away from the 400th anniversary of the first enslaved people arriving in what would become the United States of America. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
 In June 2010, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a District Court abused its discretion in issuing an injunction in a case involving GM alfalfa, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
" In January the US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a previous Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that the Clean Water Act did not regulate pesticide application "into, over, or near ‘waters of the United States'" as long as EPA labeling requirements were followed.The Sixth Circuit ruled in "National Cotton Council v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am by John Elwood
Cotton, 13-551, involving a qualified immunity claim arising from a police officer’s error entering a license plate number, and Martinez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, 13-449, a high-visibility dispute between the national Episcopal Church and a portion of a former congregation over who gets to open a Quizno’s in an especially prime location. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:57 am by Larry
United States, a recent decision of the Court of International Trade. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-744Issue: Whether a medical professional can be convicted of “knowingly and willfully” making a false statement in medical records or reports under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm by Angie Gou
United States (in which the office supported sentencing reductions for certain crack-cocaine offenders). [read post]