Search for: "United States v. Damon"
Results 121 - 140
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
DAMON & MOREY, LLP, Defendant.;07-CV-143A ; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 389 B.R. 314; 2008 U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:15 am
Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:45 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:20 am
The Debtors filed a petition seeking relief under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Chapter 7 Case"). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm
United States, 364 U.S. 40 (1960). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:25 am
The case of Kiyemba v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:17 pm
United States, a truly landmark case, argued and won by Damon Key attorneys Charlie Bocken and Diane Hastert. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am
Briefly: Writing for Reason.com, Damon Root suggests that judicial restraint has an inherent pro-government bias, and that even if the Court’s ruling in Citizens United departed from judicial restraint, the ruling protected “constitutional rights from democratic majorities. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
United States, 150 F. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
Local 5 v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:08 pm
v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:30 am
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:19 pm
11-13-2009 National: by Damon W. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 3:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:10 pm
The New York Court of Appeals – the state’s highest court -is about to consider an important property rights case, Goldstein v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
DAMON & MOREY, LLP, Defendant.;07-CV-143A ; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 389 B.R. 314; 2008 U.S. [read post]
