Search for: "United States v. Dennings" Results 121 - 140 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Bruckman, 257 App.Div. 795, 796, 15 N.Y.S.2d 679, 680, rearg. den., 258 App.Div. 938, 17 N.Y.S.2d 620, mot. for [71 Misc.2d 759] lv. to app. den., 259 App.Div. 791, 18 N.Y.S.2d 1013, appeal dismissed, 284 N.Y. 736, 31 N.E.2d 203, app. den., 261 App.Div. 883, 26 N.Y.S.2d 489; Matter of Banks v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:00 am by Jan von Hein
Today the Basel standards, in fact, strongly influence national banking regulation both in the European Union and in the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
In Bulmer v Bollinger, Lord Denning famously referred to the incoming tide of what is now EU law, observing that ‘[i]t flows into the estuaries and up the rivers. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 8:23 pm by Patricia Salkin
Board of Education of Sycamore Community Unit School District v Silverthorne Development Company, 2023 IL App (2d) 220170-U (July 25, 2023) [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:28 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Los resultados muestran que la brecha racial en las sentencias se ha ampliado desde que se emitió la sentencia de United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:05 am
Donoghue of the United States (prior posts) and Xue Hanqin of China (prior posts), both elected in 2010. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:32 am
The International Court of Justice's Decision in Bosnia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am by Lisa Rodgers
The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating that the important consideration was not the sufficient British connection between the employer and employee for the purposes of employment law, but rather the connection between the co-workers. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
 On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]