Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 121 - 140
of 765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 6:35 am
Bolchos v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:14 pm
The young United States did not wish to harbor a pirate or slave trader considered the enemy of all mankind. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
None of the children in Chavez-Vilchez lived in family units with parents living together and in each instance the context was pegged to the factual basis that if the non-EU citizen mother leaves and the EU citizen father remains, will the EU citizen child be compelled, in practice, to leave? [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm
Lawfare readers will recall that in March the Supreme Court ordered the case of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum to be re-briefed and reargued to address the additional question of whether the Alien Tort Statute applies to violations of international law occurring in the sovereign territory of other countries. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm
Finally, there are three defendants based outside of the EU – Alphabet Inc. and Google LLC in the United States and Google Payment Limited in the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:12 pm
In the Washington Post, former Bush Administration State Department Legal Advisor John Bellinger, argues that ATS lawsuits are being used to harass corporations into settlements, to interfere with other nation’s domestic affairs, and to embroil the United States in disputes with important foreign allies like the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Germany. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Now, the Court intends to decide:Whether and under what circumstances the Alien Tort Statute allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The United States and Ecuador are both members of the Organization of American States and parties to the Inter-American Convention, so that a majority of the parties are citizens of a State or States that have ratified or acceded to the Inter-American Convention and are member States of the Organization of American States, and thus that Convention rather than the New York Convention appears to apply” (citations and internal… [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:09 pm
Chevron Texaco (09-15641); Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:11 pm
On June 24, the United States Supreme Court rendered its decision in the case of former Enron executive Jeffrey Skilling. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
The Court ruled, instead, that “all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:00 am
The government objects to the defendants' efforts to scuttle the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:33 am
See Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am
Omit the facts portion of the memo in your answer.Question 3As you know, a House of Representatives select committee charged with investigating the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol has issued subpoenas for records and testimony from various actors, including the Archivist of the United States (as custodian of executive records), former officials in the Trump administration, and informal advisors to the President. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
And contrary to some commentators, the 1790 criminal piracy statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
Plata and Citizens United v. [read post]
