Search for: "United States v. Escobar"
Results 121 - 140
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
United States ex rel Escobar. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
It draws its authority from the DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005, which granted the Attorney General power to direct federal agencies to collect DNA from “individuals who are arrested, facing charges, or convicted or from non-United States persons who are detained under the authority of the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:23 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 11:03 am
Confession Was Involuntary State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
Ratliff for the conference of 12.29.09 Escobar v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 6:12 am
One method is to obtain cancellation of removal for legal permanent residents, which requires seven years of continuous residence in the United States after being admitted into the US in any status. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:31 am
United States; Siegelman v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
United States, 31 Fed. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:31 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
In Córdoba v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:57 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 10:29 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 11:36 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:06 am
Statutory Background Under the INA, lawful permanent residents of the United States are not citizens of the United States, but they hold “green cards” and enjoy the right to live and work in the United States with little restraint compared to other lawful immigration categories. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm
The first case, United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am
(b) Articulable: In contrast to Escobar v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
