Search for: "United States v. Exxon Corp."
Results 121 - 135
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
: The United States Supreme Court Takes A Swing At Interpreting The Ever-Elusive Language Of The § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction Statute In Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 2:04 pm
(The application was 07A546; the case, while continuing in District Court, is also pending on appeal to the Supreme Court — Exxon Mobil, et al., v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 1:07 pm
The case is Exxon Mobil, et al., v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 12:32 pm
Exxon Corp v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Exxon Mobile Corp., et al. (07-276). [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 7:41 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
United States 54 USPQ2d 1519, 1530 (Ct. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It is also ultra vires under well-established law.The seminal case applying the municipal cost recovery rule (sometimes also called the "free public services doctrine") is a sixty-year old Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 5:47 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:27 am
Exxon Corp., 486 U. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
Calling the motion "wholly without merit, both factually and legally," the judge, Denny Chin of United States District Court threw out the case. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:55 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:16 pm
When it agreed to hear Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
