Search for: "United States v. Flood" Results 121 - 140 of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
The Court--or rather the same five Justices appointed by Republicans who brought us Citizens United--held that Citizens United squarely forbids states from banning corporate spending on elections--whatever the facts in that state. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:49 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
Vitriolic political ads - funded by anonymous donors, accountable to no one – are flooding the airwaves in primary states. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am by Dan Farber
United States, in which the state sought compensation for the temporary flooding on a game management area due to a dam. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 8:55 am by Howard Friedman
The United States returns as a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council.9. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:41 am by Jon Katz
As a Fairfax criminal defense lawyer, I know that after having barred the death penalty for crimes committed when one is under eighteen, the United States Supreme Court proceeded to bar statutory mandatory life in prison without parole for that population. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by SHG
Chemerinsky notes in the cert petition that 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote in his dissent from denial of en banc review in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 12:44 pm by Unknown
PCI Gaming Authority.Internet gaming on & off tribal lands.Digging deeper to protect tribal property interests: United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:24 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]