Search for: "United States v. Floyd"
Results 121 - 140
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2017, 8:12 am
United States in 1944. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
The United States is now seeking almost $100 million in damages. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
The United States is now seeking almost $100 million in damages. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
The UFC has extended its agreement with Joe Hand Promotions allowing the company to continue serving as the exclusive commercial distributor of UFC pay-per-view events in the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:52 am
This question is posed by Floyd LJ in the introduction to the Court of Appeal decision on the Argos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc [2018] EWCA Civ 2211. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am
” This part of the decision opened the door to an exponential increase in civil rights litigation and enforcement in the United States from the early 1960s until today. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 1:33 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky granted Wausau’s motion. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Mr Justice Floyd allowed the proposed amendments to the '881 patent and held the patent to be valid. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am
But several years before Citizens United, the Court largely nullified a major section of its McCain-Feingold decision when it ruled, in FEC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:10 pm
"The seminal case concerning the impact of the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement on an individual's statutory rights under Section 75 of the Civil Service Law is Antinore v State [40 NY2d 6].In Antinore the Court of Appeals held that in the event an individual elects to proceed with a disciplinary proceeding set out in a collective bargaining agreement, he or she may not later claim the right to relitigate the charges under a statutory due process… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
Floyd v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
No. 1J v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:38 am
The McCutcheon v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:15 am
I’ve written on numerous occasions in the past about celebrities who registered their own names as trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:43 am
Floyd v. [read post]
