Search for: "United States v. Gavin" Results 121 - 140 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Rakove sets out to solve in Kennedy, Johnson, and the Nonaligned World is how to explain the remarkable transformation in the relationship between the United States and much of the postcolonial world over the course of the 1960s. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm by Jani
With the Alice Corporation v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision looming in the horizon, and the patentability of software in the US faces its most recent judicial challenge, this writer thought it was best to look at the origins of the current stance of such patents in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:56 am by Jeff Gamso
  How dare the president of the United States use his office to divide the country and instigate such a hateful idea? [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:26 am by Cormac Early
United States continued yesterday. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:48 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
The Perry case is widely anticipated to end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Respondent Philip Gavin Smith ("Smith") was a citizen of the United States and resided in Maine. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am by Melina Padron
Russell KNAGGS and Ramzy KHACHIK v the United Kingdom – 46559/06 [2011] ECHR 1328 (30 August 2011) European Court of Human Rights: refusal to admit intercept evidence in court proceedings not breach of human rights. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:50 pm by Eric
Superior Ct. 2005) in which Google sued an alleged click fraudster and won a $75k default judgment; and United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am by INFORRM
Yesterday’s decision in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04) has become the most discussed media law case of the year so far. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am by Mary A. Fischer
Board of Education On Monday, December 6, San Francisco police are bracing for record crowds to jam the streets surrounding the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm by INFORRM
A public interest defence which could only be rebutted by proof of malice would not strike a fair balance (and, as the position in the United States shows, would not make reduce litigation or make it cheaper). [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]