Search for: "United States v. Hobbs" Results 121 - 140 of 465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, finding that the Hobbs Act requires a quid pro quo when involving campaign contributions; and McDonnell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm by John Floyd
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down   In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:54 am by Christopher Walker
United States, he does not engage with the court’s thorny prior precedent on this point that Aditya Bamzai attempted to distinguish in his law-professor amicus brief. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm by Mark Walsh
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., about whether the Hobbs Act requires a [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” But, as Thomas Hobbes always insisted, a people is a strictly artificial construction, which exists and acts only through the institutions that define its sovereignty. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am by Christopher Walker
Rachel Kovner, representing the United States as amicus curiae in support of Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, brought much clarity to the argument. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:34 am by Christopher Walker
United States fame, returns to the court as a law-professor amicus. [read post]