Search for: "United States v. I. L." Results 121 - 140 of 5,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2007, 6:30 am
Johnson, JAGC, USN's article in the Journal of Military and Veteran Law in which he argues that the manner in which the Navy counsels Sailors and Marines falls short of the requirements of United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
Article I speaks of “Offences against the Law of Nations,” while both Article III and Article VI’s Supremacy Clause, which defines the scope of pre-emptive federal law, omit that phrase while referring to the “Laws of the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:30 am by Viking
  In that post I referenced United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December  in In Re United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am by Lawrence Solum
By 2007 I lamented the “untimely death” of Bush v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Veazie, 8 How. 251, 255–256 (1850); United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
Clark.First, the main brief of the petitioner, the State of Ohio.Next, the joint appendix.And now the amici:The United StatesDomestic Violence Legal Empowerment & Appeals Project (DV LEAP)Fern L. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
Clark.First, the main brief of the petitioner, the State of Ohio.Next, the joint appendix.And now the amici:The United StatesDomestic Violence Legal Empowerment & Appeals Project (DV LEAP)Fern L. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:48 am by Brian Shiffrin
For example, this week, in a statement regarding the denial of certiorari in  Calhoun v United States (568 US __ [2/25/13]), Justices Sotomayor and Breyer condemned the racial  argument of the Assistant United States Attorney,  but did not name the attorney:It is deeply disappointing to see a representative of theUnited States resort to this base tactic more than a decade into the 21st century. [read post]