Search for: "United States v. Knox" Results 121 - 140 of 189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
  Harris appears to be on hold for Knox v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
Gottlieb notified Agent Azad and Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Knox that he was representing defendant and asked that his client not be interviewed unless he was present. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm by John Knox
As in Empagran, the Court may say that even if the claim has a connection with the United States, the connection must be strong enough to make the exercise of jurisdiction not “unreasonable. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:04 am by Joshua Matz
United States, arguing that the Ninth Circuit’s “unbounded interpretation risks greater over criminalization and further misuse of the federal criminal code. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm by zshapiro
As I pointed out in a prior post the 1983 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
Ross Runkel at this blog discusses this week’s oral argument in Knox v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am by Kiran Bhat
” The Court will also hear arguments today in Knox v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Max Mosley went to the European Court of Human Rights with his application against the United Kingdom. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:06 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 am
A terrible joke for a serious issue that has plagued the US farming community and US courts for years – most recently in an appeal from the Southern District of Indiana to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") in the case of Monsanto v Bowman. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am by Conor McEvily
  For this blog’s Academic round-up, Amanda Frost examines some of the academic commentary on the Fourth Amendment’s applicability to GPS surveillance, an issue the Court will take up in United States v. [read post]