Search for: "United States v. Lester"
Results 121 - 140
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Congress, having referred to the first amendment and stated that it is “necessary to promote the vigorous dialogue necessary to shape public policy in a representative democracy” went on to note that: “some persons are obstructing the free expression rights of United States authors and publishers, and in turn chilling the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States interest of the citizenry in receiving information on… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Nor are developing countries likely to model their legal system on countries with first amendment protection, such as the United States, if the verdicts are 15 times higher than in the United Kingdom[6]. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am
Yesterday’s decision in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04) has become the most discussed media law case of the year so far. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Damages are not capped in the United States or in Canada, New Zealand or South Africa. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
In Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Limited (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 Lord Keith stated that “the right to personal privacy is clearly one in which the law in this field should seek to protect. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
Reynolds and Jameel – the existing law Before examining the proposals in Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill it is perhaps worth summarising shortly the existing state of the Reynolds common law defence. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm
United Kingdom Judgment of 10 March 2009). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
The political and constitutional settlement in most European countries is very different from that of the United States and our histories have surely led us to value these interests differently. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
In Steel and Morris v United Kingdom ((2005) 41 EHRR 22) it was held that an award of £40,000 against defendants of modest resources was disproportionate ([96]). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:19 pm
As Lord Lester appears to recognise, this is not a reform proposal which should be taken forward. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
__Reed v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
(Case No. 07-1853cv), the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that a Bankruptcy Code Provision [11 U.S.C. sec. 526(a)(4)] did not violate the First Amendment freedom of speech rights of attorney Zenas Zelotes. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm
A public interest defence which could only be rebutted by proof of malice would not strike a fair balance (and, as the position in the United States shows, would not make reduce litigation or make it cheaper). [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
First, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held against American Needle. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
-- Harvard medical school emeritus professor Lester Grinspoon estimates that at least $200 million is needed for studies to get a drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
Update: Sex, Drugs, and 3000 Billable HoursDefendant law firm moves to strike 'scandalous' material.
18 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Earlier: Lawsuit of the Day: Sex, Drugs, and 3000 Billable Hours Law - Lawyers & Law Firms - Services - United States - Business and Corporate Law [read post]
