Search for: "United States v. Low" Results 121 - 140 of 4,691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law The United States Supreme Court is currently hearing arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:36 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois has issued another opinion in the Noonan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 am
United States Supreme Court holds city’s review of employee messages on city pager was reasonable under the circumstances Source: Meyers Nave PLC. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by Jack Goldsmith
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully… [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
In its 2-1 decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 6:55 pm
"The Coast Guard Court is just as dismissive of Lowe: "United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 65 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:01 am by Greg Mersol
The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently issued a case involving the straight-forward application of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm by Linda Holmes
The United States Supreme Court on Thursday, June 25, 2015 upheld federal health insurance subsidies for moderate and low income Americans as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 9:17 am by Trevor Cutaiar
On August 3, 2016, the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Tundidor v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:12 pm
Woods’s lawyers argued that his intelligence scores were low enough that he should be spared because of the Supreme Court ban in Atkins v. [read post]