Search for: "United States v. Madison" Results 121 - 140 of 1,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted Mayo's petition for certiorari in Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But it has often played a similar role in historical writing on the United States after the Revolution, and especially in historical writing on federalism. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am by David Super
Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 165-66 (1803): By the Constitution of the United States, the President is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discre­tion, and is accountable only to his country in his political character and to his own conscience. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
SMITH: Your Honor, my main ground today is exactly that, that this Court said last year in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 9:45 am by NCC Staff
Sanford, in which the Supreme Court held that African Americans were not citizens of the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants are not professionals as required for a claim for professional malpractice (see Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20, 28 [2001]; Starr v Fuoco Group LLP, 137 AD3d 634, 634 [1st Dept 2016]; Leather v United States Trust Co. of N. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
US Supreme Court holds it has jurisdiction to review decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces of the United StatesOrtiz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:47 am by The Charge
 In the United States, the legislative model has failed to ensure a fair criminal justice system. [read post]